Arrow Agency, Inc. v. Terry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Arrow Agency, Inc. v. Terry

24 A.D.2d 490, 261 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3877

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 490 (Arrow Agency, Inc. v. Terry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arrow Agency, Inc. v. Terry, 24 A.D.2d 490, 261 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a corporate insurance broker to recover damages for tortious interference with its customers by the defendant, Alfred B. Terry, its former employee, in that he allegedly diverted such customers to his own account, in which action said defendant interposed six counterclaims to recover damages for the alleged defamation of his character, by the corporate plaintiff and its president, Douglas C. Snyder, the said corporate plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 24, 1964, as denied its motion to dismiss the said counterclaims for failure to state a cause of action (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 7). Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs (cf. Imperatrice v. Imperatrice, 298 N. Y. 549). Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a corporate insurance broker to recover damages for tortious interference with its customers by the defendant, Alfred B. Terry, its former employee, in that he allegedly diverted such customers to his own account, in which action said defendant interposed six counterclaims to recover damages for the alleged defamation of his character, by the corporate plaintiff and its president, Douglas C. Snyder, the said corporate plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 24, 1964, as denied its motion to dismiss the said counterclaims for failure to state a cause of action (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 7). Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs (cf. Imperatrice v. Imperatrice, 298 N. Y. 549). Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 490, 261 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arrow-agency-inc-v-terry-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack