Interstate Operating Co. v. O. P. G. Recreation Center, Inc.
This text of 279 A.D. 753 (Interstate Operating Co. v. O. P. G. Recreation Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In our opinion, the first cause of action alleged facts sufficient to state a cause of action for conversion. (Mallory Associates v. Barving Realty Co., 300 N. Y. 297.) Such being the ease, the motion to dismiss, directed to the entire complaint, was properly denied, and it is unnecessary to determine whether the second cause of action alleged states facts sufficient to constitute any other separate cause of action. (Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co., 296 N. Y. 79, 84; Imperatrice v. Imperatrice, 298 N. Y. 549, 550.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 753, 108 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interstate-operating-co-v-o-p-g-recreation-center-inc-nyappdiv-1951.