Interstate Operating Co. v. O. P. G. Recreation Center, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Interstate Operating Co. v. O. P. G. Recreation Center, Inc.

279 A.D. 753, 108 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3657

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 10, 1951·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In our opinion, the first cause of action alleged facts sufficient to state a cause of action for conversion. (Mallory Associates v. Barving Realty Co., 300 N. Y. 297.) Such being the ease, the motion to dismiss, directed to the entire complaint, was properly denied, and it is unnecessary to determine whether the second cause of action alleged states facts sufficient to constitute any other separate cause of action. (Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co., 296 N. Y. 79, 84; Imperatrice v. Imperatrice, 298 N. Y. 549, 550.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In our opinion, the first cause of action alleged facts sufficient to state a cause of action for conversion. (Mallory Associates v. Barving Realty Co., 300 N. Y. 297.) Such being the ease, the motion to dismiss, directed to the entire complaint, was properly denied, and it is unnecessary to determine whether the second cause of action alleged states facts sufficient to constitute any other separate cause of action. (Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co., 296 N. Y. 79, 84; Imperatrice v. Imperatrice, 298 N. Y. 549, 550.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Interstate Operating Co. v. O. P. G. Recreation Center, Inc., 279 A.D. 753, 108 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

279 A.D. 753 (Interstate Operating Co. v. O. P. G. Recreation Center, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related