Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 410
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 Cust. Ct. 161 →
United States Customs Court·Decided April 9, 1962·No. No. 66685; protest 60/29476 (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of porcelain furniture sets similar in all material respects to those the subject of J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. v. United States (34 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 1695), the merchandise was held dutiable under paragraph 1513 of the act or under said paragraph, as modified, supra, at the rate in effect at the time the respective items were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 410 (cusc 1962).
48 Cust. Ct. 410 (Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 145 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)