Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 390
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 Cust. Ct. 161 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 28, 1962·No. No. 66624; protests 60/30720 and 61/7832 (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chinaware miniature coffee and tea sets the same in all material respects as those the subject of B. Shackman & Co. and S. Stern Henry & Co. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 298, C.D. 1426), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 390 (cusc 1962).
48 Cust. Ct. 390 (Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shackman v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 298 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)