Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 332

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 Cust. Ct. 161 →

United States Customs Court·Decided February 7, 1961·No. No. 65145; protest 267121-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

[333]*333Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Butler Bros. v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C.D. 303), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 332 (cusc 1961).

Pincite

46 Cust. Ct. 332 (Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related