IESI NY Corp. v. Martinez

13 A.D.3d 319, 786 N.Y.S.2d 301, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15640
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in IESI NY Corp. v. Martinez. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 A.D.3d 667

Opinion

[320]*320Determination of respondent Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, dated December 30, 2002, finding that petitioner’s truck was overweight in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 385 (9), and imposing a fine, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County [Barry Salman, J.], entered November 13, 2003) dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Petitioner challenges the accuracy of the scales used to weigh the vehicle in question. Specifically, it argues that the copy of the postweighing certifications of the scale sets presented at the administrative hearing was illegible and that proper testing generally consists of a series of tests before and after the issuance of the summons. The Court of Appeals has rejected the argument that before and after testing of the scales is required (see People v Roberts, 308 NY 826 [1955]). Here, the scales were tested and found accurate less than two months before the summonses were issued. In any event, on the administrative appeal, the Appeals Board found that the postsummons certificate established the accuracy of the scales. Concur—Sullivan, J.P, Ellerin, Lerner, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IESI NY Corp. v. Martinez, 13 A.D.3d 319, 786 N.Y.S.2d 301, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15640 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

13 A.D.3d 319 (IESI NY Corp. v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Roberts
125 N.E.2d 875 (New York Court of Appeals, 1955)