IESI NY Corp. v. Martinez

11 A.D.3d 215, 782 N.Y.S.2d 256, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11505
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 2004·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Determination of respondent dated December 23, 2002, which affirmed the findings of an Administrative Law Judge, made after a hearing, that petitioner had violated the weight provisions of the Vehicle and Traffic Law and the New York City Traffic Rules and Regulations, and imposed a penalty, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, Bronx County [Anne E. Targum, J.], entered on or about September 23, 2003) dismissed, without costs.

The determination that petitioner’s vehicle was overweight in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 401 (7) (F) and 34 RCNY 4-15 (b) (9) and (10) is supported by substantial evidence. The officer who issued the summonses credibly offered testimony regarding the condition of the roadway where the truck was weighed, his training, the manner in which he weighed the vehicle, and the weight and measurements recorded (Matter of Maspeth Ave. Operating Corp. v Martinez, 2 AD3d 446 [2003]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Marlow and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IESI NY Corp. v. Martinez, 11 A.D.3d 215, 782 N.Y.S.2d 256, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

11 A.D.3d 215 (IESI NY Corp. v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Isabella City Carting Corp. v. Martinez
15 A.D.3d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Tri Messine Construction Co. v. Martinez
15 A.D.3d 283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)