Hughley v. State
This text of 615 So. 2d 1245 (Hughley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON RETURN TO REMAND
We remanded this cause to the Lee County Circuit Court so that the State could submit an appropriate response, pursuant to Rule 32.7(a), A.R.Cr.P., to the trial court’s summary dismissal of the petitioner’s Rule 32 petition based on procedural grounds. Rule 32.2(c), A.R.Cr.P.
The trial court has now filed its return indicating that the State has filed a response asking that the petition be dismissed on procedural grounds because, it says, the limitations period has expired. The trial court adopts its previous order dismissing the petition pursuant to Rule 32.2(c), A.R.Cr.P.
Based on the foregoing, the judgment of the trial court in dismissing the petition is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
615 So. 2d 1245, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 179, 1993 WL 35118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughley-v-state-alacrimapp-1993.