Hughley v. State

615 So. 2d 1245, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 179, 1993 WL 35118
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hughley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1589
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided February 12, 1993·No. CR-91-460·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

McMILLAN, Judge.

We remanded this cause to the Lee County Circuit Court so that the State could submit an appropriate response, pursuant to Rule 32.7(a), A.R.Cr.P., to the trial court’s summary dismissal of the petitioner’s Rule 32 petition based on procedural grounds. Rule 32.2(c), A.R.Cr.P.

The trial court has now filed its return indicating that the State has filed a response asking that the petition be dismissed on procedural grounds because, it says, the limitations period has expired. The trial court adopts its previous order dismissing the petition pursuant to Rule 32.2(c), A.R.Cr.P.

Based on the foregoing, the judgment of the trial court in dismissing the petition is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hughley v. State, 615 So. 2d 1245, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 179, 1993 WL 35118 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

615 So. 2d 1245 (Hughley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.