Huey v. State
Opinion
Conviction is for keeping a disorderly house; punishment fixed at a fine of $200 and confinement in. the county jail for a period of twenty days.
We find no statement of facts. Copied in the record is the stenographer’s notes in question and answer form. This does not comply with the law requiring a succinct statement of the facts. Code-of Crim. Proc., Art. 844C. This court has so held on numerous-occasions. Ferguson v. State, 83 Texas Crim. Rep., 273, and cases, therein cited; Mooney v. State, 73 Texas Crim. Rep., 122; Felder v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 144; Margrave v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 147; Fox v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 150.
In the absence of the statement of facts, the bills of exceptions complaining of the charge of the court present no error. No other bills-are found.'
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
235 S.W. 879 (Huey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.