Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Shurbet v. State

Shurbet v. State

60 S.W.2d 791, 124 Tex. Crim. 50, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 348
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 3, 1933
DocketNo. 15923
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 60 S.W.2d 791 (Shurbet v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shurbet v. State, 60 S.W.2d 791, 124 Tex. Crim. 50, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 348 (Tex. 1933).

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for aggravated assault; punishment, a fine of $25.

An inspection of the record shows that the statement of facts in this case is in question and answer form, which is forbidden by the terms of article 760, C. C. P., hence the state[51]*51ment of facts cannot be considered. Choate v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 266; Huey v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 400; Johnson v. State, 91 Texas Crim. Rep., 441; King v. State, 95 Texas Crim. Rep., 93; Smith v. State, 100 Texas Crim. Rep., 234.

There are a number of bills of exception in the record, but in the absence of a statement of facts it is impossible for this court to appraise the complaints attempted to be thus brought forward.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Midkiff v. State
209 S.W.2d 354 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1948)
Neely v. State
161 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1942)
Stanley v. State
158 S.W.2d 785 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1942)
Stevens v. State
116 S.W.2d 384 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 S.W.2d 791, 124 Tex. Crim. 50, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shurbet-v-state-texcrimapp-1933.