Huey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Huey v. State

235 S.W. 887

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 7, 1921

DocketNo. 6521

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 235 S.W. 887 (Huey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huey v. State, 235 S.W. 887 (Tex. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.

Conviction is for keeping a disorderly house; punishment fixed at a fine of $200 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 20 days. [1] AVe find no statement of facts. Copied in the record are the stenographer’s notes in question and answer form. This does not comply with the law requiring a succinct statement of the facts. Vernon’s Ann. Code Cr. Proe. 1916, art. 844c. This court has so held on numerous occasions. Ferguson v. State, 83 Tex. Cr. R. 273, 202 S. W. 733, and cases therein cited; Mooney v. State, 73 Tex. Cr. R. 122, 164 S. W. 828; Felder v. State, 59 Tex. Cr. R. 144, 127 S. W. 1055; Hargrave v. State, 53 Tex. Cr. R. 147, 109 S. W. 163; Fox v. State, 53 Tex; Cr. R. 150, 109 S. W. 370.

[2] In the absence of th' statement of facts, the bills of exceptions .omplaining of the charge of the court present no error. No other bills are found.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, P. J.

Conviction is for keeping a disorderly house; punishment fixed at a fine of $200 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 20 days. [1] AVe find no statement of facts. Copied in the record are the stenographer’s notes in question and answer form. This does not comply with the law requiring a succinct statement of the facts. Vernon’s Ann. Code Cr. Proe. 1916, art. 844c. This court has so held on numerous occasions. Ferguson v. State, 83 Tex. Cr. R. 273, 202 S. W. 733, and cases therein cited; Mooney v. State, 73 Tex. Cr. R. 122, 164 S. W. 828; Felder v. State, 59 Tex. Cr. R. 144, 127 S. W. 1055; Hargrave v. State, 53 Tex. Cr. R. 147, 109 S. W. 163; Fox v. State, 53 Tex; Cr. R. 150, 109 S. W. 370.

[2] In the absence of th' statement of facts, the bills of exceptions .omplaining of the charge of the court present no error. No other bills are found.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 S.W. 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huey-v-state-texcrimapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack