Montez, Del Real v. State
This text of 276 S.W. 709 (Montez, Del Real v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was convicted in the district court of Bexar county for the offense of theft and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.
The appellant was convicted on the second count in an indictment wherein he is charged with the offense of theft by conversion as bailee, of the sum of $95.00 alleged to have been the property of Anselma Cervantz. The evidence is amply sufficient to support the verdict.
There are ten bills of exception in the record in which complaint is made at various rulings of the court, but each of these bills of exception is in question and answer form and for that reason cannot be considered by this court. Robbins v. State, 272 S. W., 175; Romez v. State, 245 S. W., 914; Jetty v. State, 235 S. W., 589; Rylee v. State, 236 S. W., 744; Huey v. State, 235 S. W., 887, and the many eases referred to in those opinions.
The indictment being in proper form and the evidence sufficient to support the verdict, and there being no other questions properly before this court for review, it is our opinion that the judgment should be in all things affirmed.
• Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 S.W. 709, 101 Tex. Crim. 582, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montez-del-real-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.