Hudson v. Gilbert

1938 OK 68, 75 P.2d 1139, 182 Okla. 43, 1938 Okla. LEXIS 48
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 1, 1938·No. No. 28288.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error filed their transcript of a proceeding on November 30, 1937, and attached thereto is & certificate of the court clerk naming certain instruments included in the transcript and certifying that they are each full, true and exact copies of the originals of such instruments as the same appear on file and of record in the office of the court clerk of MeCurtain county in cause No. 95S4, entitled John I. Gilbert, as receiver for Gum Brothers Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, v. M. E. Hudson et al., Defendants.

We are of the opinion that such certificate is insufficient, and hold that the cause must be dismissed under the following authorities : Schabel v. Wright, 179 Okla. 73, 64 P. (2d) 855; Render v. Dodson, 179 Okla. 352, 66 P. (2d) 14; Wade v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95; McGuire v. Rash, 89 Okla. 132, 214 P. 698; Thomas v. Potter, 164 Okla. 212, 23 P. (2d) 381.

The appeal is dismissed.

BAYLESS, V. C. J., and RILEY, PPIELPS, CORN', and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. Gilbert, 1938 OK 68, 75 P.2d 1139, 182 Okla. 43, 1938 Okla. LEXIS 48 (Okla. 1938).

1938 OK 68 (Hudson v. Gilbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunter v. Pepis
1945 OK 184 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1945)