Render v. Dodson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Render v. Dodson

1936 OK 851, 66 P.2d 14, 179 Okla. 352, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 750

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 22, 1936

DocketNo. 27134.

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 1936 OK 851 (Render v. Dodson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Render v. Dodson, 1936 OK 851, 66 P.2d 14, 179 Okla. 352, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 750 (Okla. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A motion to dismiss has been filed in this cause for the reason that the certificate of the court clerk does not purport to present a transcript of the record.

We are of the opinion that the case must be dismissed under the rule announced many times by this court. See Wade v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95; Champion Oil Co. v. Burke, 90 Okla. 33, 215 P. 756. It is true the clerk certified that it is a full, true, correct, and complete copy of certain instruments, and sets out ten instruments.

The court cannot presume, or judicially know, that this is all of record unless the clerk’s certificate is attached to the transcript stating that it is all of the record. The very purpose of the certificate is to satisfy this court that there are no other pleadings of record than those included in the transcript.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, Y. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, BUSBY, and -GIBSON, JJ., concur. WELCH, PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI