Schabel v. Wright

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Schabel v. Wright

1937 OK 53, 64 P.2d 855, 179 Okla. 73, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 686

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 26, 1937·No. No. 27193.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 20th day of November, 1936', the court entered its order refusing to vacate an order confirming sale. The appeal is from that order and is by transcript of the record.

A motion to dismiss has been filed in which it is pointed out that there is no sufficient certificate to the record presented to this court. Without deciding whether or not such order can be presented to this court on a transcript, it appears that the appeal must be dismissed for the reason assigned. See Wade v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95; Walcher v. Stone, 15 Okla. 130, 79 P. 771.

The appeal is dismissed.

OSBORN, C. J., BAYLESS, Y. C. J.¡ and BUSBY, WELCH, PHELPS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. RILEY and HUP ST, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the 20th day of November, 1936', the court entered its order refusing to vacate an order confirming sale. The appeal is from that order and is by transcript of the record.

A motion to dismiss has been filed in which it is pointed out that there is no sufficient certificate to the record presented to this court. Without deciding whether or not such order can be presented to this court on a transcript, it appears that the appeal must be dismissed for the reason assigned. See Wade v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95; Walcher v. Stone, 15 Okla. 130, 79 P. 771.

The appeal is dismissed.

OSBORN, C. J., BAYLESS, Y. C. J.¡ and BUSBY, WELCH, PHELPS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. RILEY and HUP ST, JJ., absent.

Schabel v. Wright, 1937 OK 53, 64 P.2d 855, 179 Okla. 73, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 686 (Okla. 1937).

Pincite

1937 OK 53 (Schabel v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related