Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Hubin v. Hubin

Hubin v. Hubin

738 N.E.2d 1255, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1483, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3068
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hubin v. Hubin. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 Ohio St. 3d 240 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 6, 2000·No. 00-1406·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 99AP-1156. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. III and cause consolidated with 00-1730, Hubin v. Hubin, Franklin App. No. 99AP-1156.

Douglas, Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would also allow on all other propositions of law. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hubin v. Hubin, 738 N.E.2d 1255, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1483, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3068 (Ohio 2000).

738 N.E.2d 1255 (Hubin v. Hubin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.