Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Hubin v. Hubin

Hubin v. Hubin

738 N.E.2d 1255, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1483, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3068
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 6, 2000
Docket00-1406
StatusPublished

This text of 738 N.E.2d 1255 (Hubin v. Hubin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hubin v. Hubin, 738 N.E.2d 1255, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1483, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3068 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 99AP-1156. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. III and cause consolidated with 00-1730, Hubin v. Hubin, Franklin App. No. 99AP-1156.

Douglas, Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would also allow on all other propositions of law. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
738 N.E.2d 1255, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1483, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubin-v-hubin-ohio-2000.