Hubin v. Hubin

Ohio Supreme Court

Hubin v. Hubin

2001 Ohio 187, 92 Ohio St. 3d 240

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 11, 2001

Docket2000-1730

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2001 Ohio 187 (Hubin v. Hubin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hubin v. Hubin, 2001 Ohio 187, 92 Ohio St. 3d 240 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 240.]

HUBIN, APPELLANT, v. HUBIN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Hubin v. Hubin, 2001-Ohio-187.] Domestic relations—Determining proper amount of child support in a shared- parenting case—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Pauly v. Pauly. (Nos. 00-1406 and 00-1730—Submitted May 30, 2001—Decided July 11, 2001.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1156. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Pauly v. Pauly (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 386, 686 N.E.2d 1108. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Douglas B. Dougherty, for appellant. Cloppert, Portman, Sauter, Latanick & Foley, Mark C. Collins and Rory P. Callahan, for appellee. James A. Hanneman, urging reversal for amici curiae Children’s and Parents’ Rights Association, Parents and Children for Equality, and Children’s Rights Council of Ohio. Heather W. Tootle, urging reversal for amicus curiae Edward C. Kehres. Michael R. Smalz, Ohio State Legal Services Association, urging affirmance for amici curiae Association for Children for Enforcement of Support, Ohio Now Education and Legal Fund, Ohio Domestic Violence Network, and Action Ohio Coalition for Battered Women. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 240.]

HUBIN, APPELLANT, v. HUBIN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Hubin v. Hubin, 2001-Ohio-187.] Domestic relations—Determining proper amount of child support in a shared- parenting case—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Pauly v. Pauly. (Nos. 00-1406 and 00-1730—Submitted May 30, 2001—Decided July 11, 2001.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1156. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Pauly v. Pauly (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 386, 686 N.E.2d 1108. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Douglas B. Dougherty, for appellant. Cloppert, Portman, Sauter, Latanick & Foley, Mark C. Collins and Rory P. Callahan, for appellee. James A. Hanneman, urging reversal for amici curiae Children’s and Parents’ Rights Association, Parents and Children for Equality, and Children’s Rights Council of Ohio. Heather W. Tootle, urging reversal for amicus curiae Edward C. Kehres. Michael R. Smalz, Ohio State Legal Services Association, urging affirmance for amici curiae Association for Children for Enforcement of Support, Ohio Now Education and Legal Fund, Ohio Domestic Violence Network, and Action Ohio Coalition for Battered Women. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 187, 92 Ohio St. 3d 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubin-v-hubin-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack