Hrdlicka v. Reniff

Ninth Circuit

Hrdlicka v. Reniff

656 F.3d 942, 2011 WL 3859575

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 1, 2011·No. 09-15768, 09-16956·Published

Opinions

Order; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT and Judge WILLIAM A. FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.

ORDER

Judge Reinhardt and Judge W. Fletcher have voted to deny the Appellees’ petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc, filed on February 15, 2011 and February 23, 2011. Judge N.R. Smith voted to grant both.

A judge of the court called for a vote on the petitions for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the [943] active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing. Fed. R.App. P. 35(f).

The petitions for rehearing and the petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT and Judge WILLIAM A. FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.

ORDER

Judge Reinhardt and Judge W. Fletcher have voted to deny the Appellees’ petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc, filed on February 15, 2011 and February 23, 2011. Judge N.R. Smith voted to grant both.

A judge of the court called for a vote on the petitions for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the [943] active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing. Fed. R.App. P. 35(f).

The petitions for rehearing and the petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Hrdlicka v. Reniff, 656 F.3d 942, 2011 WL 3859575 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

656 F.3d 942 (Hrdlicka v. Reniff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related