Howard v. State
322 S.W.3d 635, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1358, 2010 WL 3971315
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Robert Howard, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard v. State, 322 S.W.3d 635, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1358, 2010 WL 3971315 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
322 S.W.3d 635 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
ZGIET v. State
322 S.W.3d 635 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)