ZGIET v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

ZGIET v. State

322 S.W.3d 635, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1348, 2010 WL 3971314

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 12, 2010·No. ED 94614·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Richard Zgiet, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Richard Zgiet, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

ZGIET v. State, 322 S.W.3d 635, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1348, 2010 WL 3971314 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

322 S.W.3d 635 (ZGIET v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related