Howard v. State
276 S.W.3d 883, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 99, 2009 WL 307510
Opinion
ORDER
Juan Howard appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard v. State, 276 S.W.3d 883, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 99, 2009 WL 307510 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
276 S.W.3d 883 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DePriest v. State
510 S.W.3d 331 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2017)