Howard v. State
217 S.W.3d 922, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 536, 2007 WL 966640
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 545 →
Opinion
ORDER
Alan Howard appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard v. State, 217 S.W.3d 922, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 536, 2007 WL 966640 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
217 S.W.3d 922 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.