Howard v. State

793 So. 2d 98, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11465, 2001 WL 913959
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 723 So. 2d 863
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 15, 2001·No. No. 4D01-2315·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing a motion that satisfies the requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998) and Thomas v. State, 712 So.2d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

DELL, FARMER, and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. State, 793 So. 2d 98, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11465, 2001 WL 913959 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

793 So. 2d 98 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Thomas v. State
712 So. 2d 848 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)