Howard v. State

775 So. 2d 328, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8005, 2000 WL 826288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 698 So. 2d 923
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2000·No. No. 2D99-576·Published

Opinion

BLUE, Judge.

Alvin Howard appeals his convictions and sentences for attempted burglary and possession of paraphernalia. After consideration of the issues raised on appeal, we affirm. Mr. Howard was sentenced to ten [329]*329years as a habitual offender with a five-year minimum mandatory term as a prison releasee reoffender. This court has rejected the claim of a double jeopardy violation when a defendant is sentenced as both a habitual offender and as a prison releasee reoffender. See Grant v. State, 745 So.2d 519 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), review granted, No. SC99-U64, 761 So.2d 329 (Fla.2000). We certify conflict with the Fourth District, which has held to the contrary. See, e.g., Adams v. State, 750 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). But see Smith v. State, 754 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (finding no double jeopardy violation in habitual offender sentence with minimum mandatory term as prison releasee reoffender).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

PARKER, A.C.J., and GREEN, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. State, 775 So. 2d 328, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8005, 2000 WL 826288 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

775 So. 2d 328 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
754 So. 2d 100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Grant v. State
745 So. 2d 519 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Adams v. State
750 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)