Howard v. State
701 So. 2d 123, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12536, 1997 WL 689832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 645 So. 2d 156 →
Opinion
Based on Surinach v. State, 676 So.2d 997 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), we affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. As in Surinach, the affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant to file, if he has legally sufficient grounds to do so (and desires to do so), a motion to withdraw his plea.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard v. State, 701 So. 2d 123, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12536, 1997 WL 689832 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
701 So. 2d 123 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Surinach v. State
676 So. 2d 997 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)