Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. U.S. Attorney General

808 F.2d 847, 257 U.S. App. D.C. 243
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 12, 1987·No. 84-5859·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s suggestion for rehearing en banc was circulated to the full Court and the taking of a vote thereon was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that appellee’s suggestion is granted and this matter will be reheard by the Court sitting en banc. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the opinion and judgment of October 31, 1986, be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings in this matter.

Circuit Judge RUTH B. GINSBURG did not participate in this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. U.S. Attorney General, 808 F.2d 847, 257 U.S. App. D.C. 243 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

808 F.2d 847 (Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. U.S. Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seed Company Limited v. Westerman
840 F. Supp. 2d 116 (District of Columbia, 2012)
McWay v. Lahood
District of Columbia, 2010
McWay v. LaHood
269 F.R.D. 35 (D.C. Circuit, 2010)
Jones v. Bernanke
685 F. Supp. 2d 31 (District of Columbia, 2010)
Jones v. Greenspan
District of Columbia, 2010
Graham v. Mukasey
608 F. Supp. 2d 50 (District of Columbia, 2009)
Graham v. Ashcroft
District of Columbia, 2009
Scott-Blanton v. Universal City Studios Productions LLLP
246 F.R.D. 344 (District of Columbia, 2007)
United States ex rel. Fisher v. Network Software Associates
227 F.R.D. 4 (District of Columbia, 2005)
Bancoult v. McNamara
217 F.R.D. 280 (District of Columbia, 2003)