Hosseinzadeh v. Bellevue Park Homeowners Association

Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 ABOLFAZL HOSSEINZADEH, CASE NO. C18-1385-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. ASSOCIATION, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s counsel’s unopposed motion to stay 16 enforcement of the judgment pending appeal (Dkt. No. 225). 17 The Court’s previous orders set forth the relevant background for this motion in detail, so 18 the Court addresses only the essential facts here. (See Dkt. Nos. 167, 218.) The Court ordered 19 Plaintiff’s counsel to pay Defendant Bellevue Park Homeowners Association $6,165 to 20 reimburse the Association for the attorney fees it incurred in filing a meritorious motion for a 21 protective order. (See id.) Plaintiff’s counsel has since appealed the fee award (Dkt. No. 223) and 22 now moves to stay enforcement of the judgment pending the outcome of the appeal (Dkt. No. 23 225). Plaintiff’s counsel proposes to deposit $6,165 into the Court’s registry as security. (Id.) The 24 Association does not oppose. (Dkt. No. 226.) 25 “[A] party taking an appeal from the District Court is entitled to a stay of a money 26 1 judgment as a matter of right if he posts a bond in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 62[b].”1 Am. 2 Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Am. Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., 87 S. Ct. 1, 3 (1966). Rule 3 62(b) authorizes a party to post “a bond or other security.” A “monetary deposit equal to the 4 amount of the bond” is a sufficient security. W.D. Wash. Local Civ. R. 65.1(a)(1). Therefore, the 5 Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion and ORDERS: 6 1. Proceedings to enforce the Court’s judgment are STAYED. 7 2. Plaintiff’s counsel shall deposit six thousand one hundred sixty-five dollars 8 ($6,165) into the Court’s registry as security. 9 DATED this 16th day of February 2021. A 10 11 12 John C. Coughenour 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

25 1 The Court cited to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(d), but the substance of that Rule was moved to Rule 62(b) in 2018. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 62 advisory committee’s note to 2018 26 amendment.