Horel v. Valdovinos

Supreme Court

Horel v. Valdovinos

178 L. Ed. 2d 860, 131 S. Ct. 1042, 562 U.S. 1196, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 1035, 79 U.S.L.W. 3433

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 24, 2011·No. No. 10-136·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 131 S. Ct. 770, 178 L. Ed. 2d 624 (2011).

Same case below, 598 F.3d 568.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 131 S. Ct. 770, 178 L. Ed. 2d 624 (2011).

Same case below, 598 F.3d 568.

Horel v. Valdovinos, 178 L. Ed. 2d 860, 131 S. Ct. 1042, 562 U.S. 1196, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 1035, 79 U.S.L.W. 3433 (U.S. 2011).

Pincite

178 L. Ed. 2d 860 (Horel v. Valdovinos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related