Hollingsworth v. State

912 So. 2d 1279, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17218, 2005 WL 2863052
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hollingsworth v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 991 So. 2d 990
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 2005·No. No. 2D04-2926·Published

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

Doriean K. Hollingsworth seeks review of her judgments and sentences for three counts of passing worthless checks and one count of fraudulent application for a driver’s license, and the revocation of her probation based on the alleged new law violations. We affirm the convictions and the revocation without comment but reverse and remand for the trial court to enter amended judgments and sentences in accordance with its timely ruling on Holl-ingsworth’s motion to correct sentencing error, which was filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). See Diaz v. State, 901 So.2d 310, 311 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Weinheimer v. State, 829 So.2d 338, 338 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.

KELLY and CANADY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hollingsworth v. State, 912 So. 2d 1279, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17218, 2005 WL 2863052 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

912 So. 2d 1279 (Hollingsworth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diaz v. State
901 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Weinheimer v. State
829 So. 2d 338 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)