Hollingsworth v. State

864 So. 2d 582, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 893, 2004 WL 231209
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 4, 2004·No. No. 3D02-1290·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because no reversible error has been demonstrated in the trial below, the conviction and sentence are affirmed, without prejudice, however, to the maintenance of a Rule 3.850 proceeding on grounds of inadequacy of counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hollingsworth v. State, 864 So. 2d 582, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 893, 2004 WL 231209 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

864 So. 2d 582 (Hollingsworth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related