Weinheimer v. State

829 So. 2d 338, 2002 WL 31421563
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 2002·No. 2D01-2016·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

829 So.2d 338 (2002)

Ward David WEINHEIMER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D01-2016.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 30, 2002.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Chief of Criminal Law, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Ward David Weinheimer appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. While this appeal was pending, we relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court to correct a sentencing error. The trial court entered an order clarifying the sentence on August 5, 2002. We affirm that order, but remand for entry of amended judgments and sentences in accordance with the order's directives.

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and GREEN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weinheimer v. State, 829 So. 2d 338, 2002 WL 31421563 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

829 So. 2d 338 (Weinheimer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hollingsworth v. State
912 So. 2d 1279 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Quiroga v. State
910 So. 2d 939 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Diaz v. State
901 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)