Holland v. Wilson

California Supreme Court

Holland v. Wilson

18 P. 412, 76 Cal. 434, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 905

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJune 7, 1888

DocketNo. 12078

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 18 P. 412 (Holland v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holland v. Wilson, 18 P. 412, 76 Cal. 434, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 905 (Cal. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

'Thornton, J.

We think the court below ruled correctly in sustaining the demurrer to the portion of the answer numbered 3. The “plans and specifications” referred to in the agreement were a part of the contract, and should have been filed in the recorder’s office under section 1183 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The averment as to' filing is insufficient, in failing to show that the plans and specifications were filed.

Judgment affirmed.

Searls, C. J., Sharpstein, J., McFarland, J., MeJcinstry, J., and Paterson, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI