Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hoag v. State

Hoag v. State

742 So. 2d 348, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10688, 1999 WL 599236
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 11, 1999
DocketNo. 99-01556
StatusPublished

This text of 742 So. 2d 348 (Hoag v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoag v. State, 742 So. 2d 348, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10688, 1999 WL 599236 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cindy Hoffman Hoag appeals the summary denial of her request for jail credit, which the trial court treated as a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm because her motion failed to satisfy the pleading requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Hoag’s ability to file a proper [349]*349rule 3.800(a) motion in the trial court which alleges that the court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief. See Spivey v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1681, 737 So.2d 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Crompton v. State, 728 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Affirmed.

FULMER, A.C.J., and STRINGER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

i

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Crompton v. State
728 So. 2d 1188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Spivey v. State
737 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
742 So. 2d 348, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10688, 1999 WL 599236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoag-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.