Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hoag v. State

Hoag v. State

711 So. 2d 572, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14468, 1997 WL 817826
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 31, 1997
DocketNo. 97-04026
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 711 So. 2d 572 (Hoag v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoag v. State, 711 So. 2d 572, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14468, 1997 WL 817826 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James C. Hoag challenges the circuit court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his plea filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(f). We affirm the order without prejudice to Hoag to file a timely motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which should not be deemed successive irrespective of the circuit court’s election in the proceeding below to treat Hoag’s rule 3.172(f) motion as one seeking postconviction relief.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and QUINCE and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoag v. State
717 So. 2d 101 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
711 So. 2d 572, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14468, 1997 WL 817826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoag-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.