Hoag v. State
711 So. 2d 572, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14468, 1997 WL 817826
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 1997·No. No. 97-04026·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
James C. Hoag challenges the circuit court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his plea filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(f). We affirm the order without prejudice to Hoag to file a timely motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which should not be deemed successive irrespective of the circuit court’s election in the proceeding below to treat Hoag’s rule 3.172(f) motion as one seeking postconviction relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoag v. State, 711 So. 2d 572, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14468, 1997 WL 817826 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
711 So. 2d 572 (Hoag v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoag v. State
717 So. 2d 101 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)