Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Spivey v. State

Spivey v. State

737 So. 2d 604, 1999 WL 496270
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 15, 1999·No. 98-3515·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

737 So.2d 604 (1999)

Floyd SPIVEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-3515.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 15, 1999.

No brief filed, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Spivey's motion to correct jail time credit, without prejudice to Spivey's ability to file a properly pled rule 3.800(a) motion in the trial court. State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla. 1998) ("[C]redit time issues are cognizable in a rule 3.800 motion when it is affirmatively alleged that the court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief."); Combs v. State, 723 So.2d 931 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED.

MINER, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spivey v. State, 737 So. 2d 604, 1999 WL 496270 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

737 So. 2d 604 (Spivey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hampton v. State
746 So. 2d 1191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Munson v. State
742 So. 2d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Hoag v. State
742 So. 2d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Gulfside Properties Corp. v. Chapman Corp.
737 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)