Hitachi Home Electronics (America), Inc. v. United States

676 F.3d 1041, 2012 WL 1059041, 34 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1023, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6476
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 30, 2012·No. 2010-1345·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc was filed by Plaintiff-Appellant, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by Defendants-Appellees.

The petition for panel rehearing was considered by the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc, response, and briefs ami[1042] cus curiae were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll of whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The petition of Plaintiff-Appellant for panel rehearing is denied.

(2) The petition of Plaintiff-Appellant for rehearing en banc is denied.

(3) The mandate of the court will issue on April 6, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hitachi Home Electronics (America), Inc. v. United States, 676 F.3d 1041, 2012 WL 1059041, 34 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1023, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6476 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

676 F.3d 1041 (Hitachi Home Electronics (America), Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United States
687 F.3d 1325 (Federal Circuit, 2012)