Hinton v. Bailey
This text of 718 S.E.2d 379 (Hinton v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles Everette HINTON,
v.
Daniel E. BAILEY, Sheriff, et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Charles E. Hinton, for Hinton, Charles Everette.
Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for Bailey, Charles E. (Sheriff), et al.
Peter S. Gilchrist III, District Attorney, for the State.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 18th of October 2011 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of October 2011."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
718 S.E.2d 379, 365 N.C. 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinton-v-bailey-nc-2011.