Hinton v. Bailey
722 S.E.2d 210, 2012 WL 651636
Opinion
Charles Everette HINTON
v.
Daniel E. BAILEY, Sheriff, et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Charles E. Hinton, for Hinton, Charles Everette.
Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for Bailey, Charles E. (Sheriff), et al.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 29th of February 2012 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of February 2012."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hinton v. Bailey, 722 S.E.2d 210, 2012 WL 651636 (N.C. 2012).
722 S.E.2d 210 (Hinton v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Wright
722 S.E.2d 210 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2012)