Hinton v. Bailey
722 S.E.2d 210, 2012 WL 651636
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 29, 2012
Docket449P11-2
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 722 S.E.2d 210 (Hinton v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hinton v. Bailey, 722 S.E.2d 210, 2012 WL 651636 (N.C. 2012).
Opinion
Charles Everette HINTON
v.
Daniel E. BAILEY, Sheriff, et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Charles E. Hinton, for Hinton, Charles Everette.
Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for Bailey, Charles E. (Sheriff), et al.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 29th of February 2012 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of February 2012."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Wright
722 S.E.2d 210 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
722 S.E.2d 210, 2012 WL 651636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinton-v-bailey-nc-2012.