Hills v. Ross

Supreme Court

Hills v. Ross

3 U.S. 184

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 15, 1796

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 U.S. 184 (Hills v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hills v. Ross, 3 U.S. 184 (1796).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

were, unanimoufly5 of opinion, that the error afiigned, was not a' fuififcient ground for reverfing the degree, and recommended to the parties to come to fame .agreement, which might bring the matters in controveriy fairly before them.

After fome converfátion, an agreement took place between the council oh both lides,'' that tne caufe ihould be continued" to the next term ; apd that, ia the mean time, new evidence [188]*188might be taken pn both fules, arid the whole rhatter of fa<&, as well as the law, brought before the Supreme Court.of tha United States, as upon an appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

were, unanimoufly5 of opinion, that the error afiigned, was not a' fuififcient ground for reverfing the degree, and recommended to the parties to come to fame .agreement, which might bring the matters in controveriy fairly before them.

After fome converfátion, an agreement took place between the council oh both lides,'' that tne caufe ihould be continued" to the next term ; apd that, ia the mean time, new evidence [188]*188might be taken pn both fules, arid the whole rhatter of fa<&, as well as the law, brought before the Supreme Court.of tha United States, as upon an appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 U.S. 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hills-v-ross-scotus-1796.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack