Hills v. Ross

3 U.S. 184
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 15, 1796·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Court

were, unanimoufly5 of opinion, that the error afiigned, was not a' fuififcient ground for reverfing the degree, and recommended to the parties to come to fame .agreement, which might bring the matters in controveriy fairly before them.

After fome converfátion, an agreement took place between the council oh both lides,'' that tne caufe ihould be continued" to the next term ; apd that, ia the mean time, new evidence [188]*188might be taken pn both fules, arid the whole rhatter of fa<&, as well as the law, brought before the Supreme Court.of tha United States, as upon an appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hills v. Ross, 3 U.S. 184 (1796).

3 U.S. 184 (Hills v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hills in Error v. Ross
3 U.S. 184 (Supreme Court, 1796)