Hill v. Whorton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hill v. Whorton

103 S.E. 412, 150 Ga. 203, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 112

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 14, 1920

DocketNo. 1675

StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 412 (Hill v. Whorton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. Whorton, 103 S.E. 412, 150 Ga. 203, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 112 (Ga. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

Under the pleading's and evidence in the ease the court did not err, at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence, in granting a nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. H. B. Moss and John P. Cheney, for plaintiffs,

cited Ware v. Barlow, 81 Ga. 1.

J. Z. Foster, for defendants,

cited Civil Code §§ 4175, 3725; Payne v. Ormond, 44 Ga. 514; Ayer v. Chapman, 146 Ga. 608, 614; Brown v. Caraker, 147 Ga. 498, and cit.; Everett v. Whitfield, 27 Ga. 159; McConnell v. Cherokee Mining Co., 114 Ga. 84; Street v. Collier, 118 Ga. 470, and cit.; Bowman v. Owens, 133 Ga. 49, 52, and cit.; Powell on Actions for Land, §§ 400, 401.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI