McConnell v. Cherokee Mining Co.

39 S.E. 941, 114 Ga. 84, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 580
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 6, 1901·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. Where in the trial of an action for the recovery of land the plaintiff relied .upon the contention that he and the defendant held under a common grantor, which was denied by the defendant, proof by the plaintiff that the defendant had in his possession a chain of title to the premises in dispute, one link of which was a conveyance from the person claimed by plaintiff to be such common grantor, was not, without more, sufficient to authorize a verdict for plaintiff, as the defendant, for aught that appeared, may have held a valid title from a different source.

2. There was no error in granting a nonsuit in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McConnell v. Cherokee Mining Co., 39 S.E. 941, 114 Ga. 84, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 580 (Ga. 1901).

39 S.E. 941 (McConnell v. Cherokee Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horton v. Wilkerson
16 S.E.2d 8 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Callahan v. Beeland
154 S.E. 226 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Harris v. McDonald
108 S.E. 448 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)
Hill v. Whorton
103 S.E. 412 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)
Brinkley v. Bell
55 S.E. 187 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)