Hill v. State
This text of 547 S.W.3d 160 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Herbert Hill appeals the motion court's judgment, following an evidentiary hearing, denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Movant pleaded guilty to burglary in the first *161degree, in violation of Section 569.160 RSMo (2016) (Count I), and sodomy in the first degree, in violation of Section 566.060 RSMo (2016) (Count II). We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
547 S.W.3d 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-state-moctapp-2018.