Hill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hill v. State

491 S.W.3d 665, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 570, 2016 WL 3180203

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 2016·No. No. ED 103215·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Melvin Hill appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035¹ [666] motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Melvin Hill appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035¹ [666] motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Hill v. State, 491 S.W.3d 665, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 570, 2016 WL 3180203 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

491 S.W.3d 665 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related