Hill v. State

115 S.E. 278, 29 Ga. App. 366, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 7
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 10, 1923
Docket14055
StatusPublished

This text of 115 S.E. 278 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. State, 115 S.E. 278, 29 Ga. App. 366, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 7 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial that would require the grant of a new trial; there is some evidence to support the finding of the jury; the verdict is approved by the trial judge, and the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 S.E. 278, 29 Ga. App. 366, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-state-gactapp-1923.