Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hill v. State

Hill v. State

115 S.E. 278, 29 Ga. App. 366, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 7
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Ga. App. 459 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 10, 1923·No. 14055·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial that would require the grant of a new trial; there is some evidence to support the finding of the jury; the verdict is approved by the trial judge, and the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 115 S.E. 278, 29 Ga. App. 366, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 7 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

115 S.E. 278 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.