Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hill v. State

Hill v. State

114 S.E. 724, 29 Ga. App. 234, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 192
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Ga. App. 459 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 17, 1922·No. 13849·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction; the charge of the court was a full, and fair presentation of the law applicable to the facts; and for no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G., J., and Bloodicorth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 114 S.E. 724, 29 Ga. App. 234, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 192 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

114 S.E. 724 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.