Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hill v. State

106 S.E. 306, 26 Ga. App. 422, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 193

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Ga. App. 459 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 8, 1921·No. 12003·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case is. here for review upon the sple assignment of error that the verdict of guilty was not authorized by the evidence. The evidence was weak; yet the jury had a right to believe, and did believe, the evidence of the prosecutor, which [424]*424evidence was sufficient to authorize the conviction of the defendant. The verdict, having the approval of the trial judge, and there being evidence to support it, cannot by this court be set aside. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

This case is. here for review upon the sple assignment of error that the verdict of guilty was not authorized by the evidence. The evidence was weak; yet the jury had a right to believe, and did believe, the evidence of the prosecutor, which [424]*424evidence was sufficient to authorize the conviction of the defendant. The verdict, having the approval of the trial judge, and there being evidence to support it, cannot by this court be set aside. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur.

Hill v. State, 106 S.E. 306, 26 Ga. App. 422, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 193 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

106 S.E. 306 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.