Hill v. Hill

570 S.E.2d 508, 356 N.C. 301
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 354 N.C. 348
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 3, 2002·No. No. 688P01·Published

Opinion

Motion by defendants (Garford Hill, Jewell Hill, Barbara Garrison and William Garrison) to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 October 2002. Eetition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 October 2002. Motion by plaintiff for summary remand denied 3 October 2002. Motion by plaintiff not to remove Hon. Mark D. Martin denied 3 October 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. Hill, 570 S.E.2d 508, 356 N.C. 301 (N.C. 2002).

570 S.E.2d 508 (Hill v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.